Bismillahirrahmanirrahim.
Assalamualaikum Warahmatullahi Wabarakatuh.
Good Morning, Salam 1Malaysia,
INTRODUCTION
1. Thank you for that very kind introduction. I want to say how delighted I am to be here with you today. Business leaders and investors are crucial to the health of Malaysia's economy - and our society. I want to thank you for the work you do, the contribution you make, and your involvement in the important discussions being held here over the coming days.
2. The theme of Invest Malaysia 2010, 'Powering Global Excellence', is a fitting one given the forward looking nature of Bursa Malaysia and the aspirations we share for our nation and our businesses. It is also precisely what I want to talk about with you today. In a new year, in a new context, in a world emerging from recession, we are focused on:- How to ensure a sustainable and robust recovery in the short and medium term- Enhancing Malaysia’s competitiveness- Sparking private investments and growth- Putting the country on a trajectory to achieve high income levels- Building an innovative economy and- Bold transformation and economic reforms to modernize our economic model for the future.
3. Such an ambitious agenda may have seemed rather idealistic 12 months ago. When we gathered here last year, the economic context was very different. The world was in the depths of the first truly global recession. Over twenty million jobs were lost. Trillions of dollars of wealth evaporated. Economies around the world faced GDP contraction. Industrial production and capital investment fell dramatically.
4. We were all happy to welcome 2010. But, while Malaysia felt the impact of this recession, I believe we weathered the storm and made progress against the odds. We refused to be passive bystanders as the downturn swept across Asia, and instead acted decisively and swiftly.
5. We injected RM67 billion of stimulus funding, and found the balance in our budget between investments our nation needs and belt-tightening required to reduce our deficit. We introduced a range of incentives and service-sector liberalisation initiatives that are opening Malaysia to high quality investment opportunities in key economic sectors.
6. We are now beginning to see the results of these actions. Fourth quarter 2009 GDP figures indicated growth of a higher-than-expected 4.5 percent. Stimulus packages are driving hundreds of job-creating infrastructure projects. Exports have rebounded, and quality foreign investments are flowing into Malaysia. The fiscal deficit is forecast to fall from 7 percent to 5.6 percent in 2010. The Industrial Production Index rebounded strongly to a 12.7 percent growth in January 2010. Total exports rose 37 percent to RM52 billion and imports increased by 31 percent to RM40 billion.
7. Positive private sector activity is also a deeply encouraging sign of recovery. Coca-Cola has announced a 1 billion Ringgit investment that could create up to 2,000 to 3,000 jobs in Malaysia. Maxis' multi-billion dollar IPO is the largest ever in Southeast Asia and represents the sort of entrepreneurial vision that I see every day in our Malaysian companies. JCY Berhad is also a proud example of a positive private sector activity that started small and now produces 25 percent of the world hard disc drives. Moving forward there will be more divestment of government holdings, capital can be raised, innovation can flourish, and wealth can be created in ways that benefit the wider Malaysian economy.
8. The global economy has not fully rebounded from the shockwaves of the past two years. No country - including ours - can be immune from the effects. But I can tell you today that Malaysia’s economic recovery is on track. The decisions of this government - and the vision of a dynamic private sector - have helped lay a foundation for the next stage of Malaysia's economic development. Ladies and gentlemen,CHALLENGES WE FACE
9. But, we have so much farther to travel on our national journey. As a government - and as Prime Minister - our aspirations for Malaysia and the Malaysian people go far beyond guiding our nation through a recovery. Indeed, the work we have done over the past year will be wasted if we simply retreat back to the status quo. That is unacceptable to me. I pledge this: we will work tirelessly to develop and implement the economic reforms that our nation needs to grow, our businesses need to succeed and above all, for our people to prosper.
10. The world economy - both before and especially since the financial crisis - has changed significantly. Policies which in the past led to high levels of growth and helped reduce hard core poverty will no longer be enough to raise income levels and create the high-value economy we want to see. We cannot depend solely on new capital to fuel growth. Rather we must use it more effectively to increase productivity, stimulate innovation and enhance the skills of the Malaysian workforce. We risk losing our competitive edge altogether if we do not act quickly to address structural barriers to growth that stand in the way of an effective response to the changing economic environment.
11. We can no longer rely on just a few sectors of the economy to drive our growth. We must diversify and provide incentives in new strategic industries where our nation has expertise, strength and potential for even greater success. As we expand into these areas, we should also consider the value that we can gain from the competencies of the Malaysian workforce - those living here and Malaysians abroad. They - with the support of foreign talent where appropriate – can provide the brainpower, the intellectual capital and skills to help us realize our goals more meaningfully. I invite Malaysians who have left our shores to look home once again and to participate in this transformation process to realize Malaysia’s full potential.
12. Our education system must continue to be re-evaluated and improved to create the workforce of the future, with a commitment to merit-based programmes. These will reward excellence and nurture talented graduates who excel in strategic and creative thinking, and entrepreneurial and leadership skills that will drive success in the decades ahead.
13. We need a government that enables and empowers the private sector. This means re-shaping and energizing the public sector to be more responsive and accountable to the needs of private citizens and businesses.
14. We must also recognize that some policies, which served a purpose in a previous era, may now be impediments to success, distorting the market and putting us at a competitive disadvantage. For instance, the government is consulting on a series of fiscal reforms that will reassess the subsidy system that exists in Malaysia and broaden our revenue-raising base through the proposed introduction of a goods and services tax. They will bring Malaysia in line with international norms and reduce an unsustainable reliance on a small number of industries, businesses and taxpayers. These are essential, common sense reforms that will allow us to move forward together as a nation, while ensuring that we enhance and strengthen safety net programs that support the welfare of Malaysia’s most vulnerable citizens.
15. Cumulatively, these deficiencies go a long way in explaining why Malaysia's private investment has not recovered to pre-Asian crisis levels and - as you know - pose a threat to our long-term position as a home for international and domestic investment.
16. Addressing these issues is not just about having a clear vision and the right policies. It’s also about having a determined political will, effective execution and the full support of the Rakyat. Do we have the courage and boldness to rise out of the middle income trap? I believe we need to build a national consensus on this issue. Because growth is beginning to revive, some are questioning the need for urgency to break the habits of the past. There are now calls to protect the status quo. Do not be fooled. We need a new way of doing things. While the recovery has begun, we must act now to position Malaysia for the future. And this is the choice we now face: To rise out of the “middle-income” trap that will be a precarious position for any nation in the new global economy; or to stick to what we know, and what is comfortable, by hoping the world will adapt to us. Our choice, and the job of the government, is to pursue economic policies that succeed in the knowledge industries of the future, with high-wage jobs and prosperity that can be shared by all.Ladies and gentlemen,NEAC REPORT
17. Today, we take an important next step in that journey. The backbone of our long-term policy agenda will be a new economic model – which will be integrated into the 10th Malaysia Plan and with a longer-term vision that will be delivered through the 11th Malaysia Plan. These can transform the Malaysian economy to become one with high incomes and quality growth over the next decade.
18. The New Economic Model is a vital part of the Malaysia we are building, the structure that will serve our people for the future. As a metaphor, think of a house under the Malaysian sun. We need a roof – an overarching philosophy that encompasses all parts of the building. In our case, 1Malaysia is the roof that we gather under. The Government Transformation Program – a programme of delivery on six key areas – is one pillar of this home. A second pillar is the Economic Transformation Plan that will deliver the New Economic Model. And the floor, the basis where all Malaysians will move forward are the 10th and 11th Malaysian Plans..
19. In the months after I became Prime Minister, I set up an independent National Economic Advisory Council, and tasked it with a thorough review of Malaysia's economy. I asked it to make bold, yet practical, recommendations for a new economic model to transform the Malaysian economy. And I can announce today that I have received the NEAC report.
20. The Report details in a frank manner, the state of the nation’s economy – its strengths and its shortcomings - and assesses the current policies and potential areas of future focus for Malaysia. It is a comprehensive and insightful analysis. I want to take this opportunity to publicly thank the Chairman of the National Economic Advisory Council, Senator Tan Sri Amirsham A Aziz, the members of the NEAC and the Secretariat team. Their work and service to the nation deserves not only our recognition, but our appreciation.
21. Today, I and the cabinet - with the counsel of NEAC - will begin our detailed deliberations on how we move forward from here, particularly as we move from this report to a roadmap for the future. But this cannot be an old-style political debate. The new economic model has wide-ranging implications for the people of Malaysia, and we cannot afford to bypass their views on this matter. Like investors, this government accords high marks for transparency. Whether in the budget or the recent Government Transformation Programme, where thousands of public citizens were involved in the process, I have instructed that this report be published and made available to the general public to gather their input and provide them with an opportunity to be part of the decision-making process over the coming months. It is only through consultation with the Rakyat and all the other stakeholders that we can achieve a strong, convincing and effective plan to implement our New Economic Model.
22. I have made clear on many previous occasions that the era of “government knows best” is over. The Rakyat - and groups such as business leaders and investors - want and deserve input into the policy making process. We must develop a more consultative approach to engaging our most important stakeholders. Only through such a process can we broaden our viewpoints, challenge conventional wisdom, and help build transparent and open consensus for the right way forward. This is the path we will follow. People will come first. Ladies and gentlemen,NEM PRINCIPLES
23. As this consultation moves forward, I want to set out three principles that I believe should guide our nation's thinking and the development of a New Economic Model. I want – as Tan Sri Amirsham has outlined – for all of us to visualize the impact of the NEM by standing in the future and envisioning what the NEM should mean to each of us as an individual and as a business.
24. Three principles emerged clearly from the NEAC report – firstly, high income, secondly, sustainability and thirdly, inclusiveness. These three principles will drive our economic progress for us to become a fully developed nation; a competitive economy strategically positioned in the regional and global economic landscape, environmentally sustainable and a quality of life that is all inclusive and encompassing..
25. We should ask ourselves this fundamental question: Will the New Economic Model create High Income jobs where the Rakyat benefit from a competitive economy, and a better way of life? This is the raison d’être of the New Economic Model. We want to see a Malaysia that makes a quantum leap from the current 7,000 U.S. dollars per capita annual income to 15,000 U.S. dollars in ten years as stated in the NEAC Report. The new economic model must be built from here. It will be no easy task, but the rewards will be great if we make this transformation . The challenge is how will we do it. This means building upon existing sectors and maximizing the potential of new ones through innovation.
26. Creating a high income nation will mean higher wages throughout the economy as growth is derived not only from capital, but from greater productivity through the use of skills and innovation, improved coordination, stronger branding and compliance with international standards and Intellectual Property Rights. In a knowledge economy, investment in new technology, multi skills, innovation and creativity, and increased competency are the drivers of public and private sector performance. We expect investment and competition for the best talent through paying higher wages. Even wages for blue collar workers will be based on them acquiring higher competencies, with their performance more readily benchmarked against international competitors. With more skills, comes greater responsibility, and better, higher paying jobs.
27. Among other findings, the NEAC Report highlights that today 80 percent of the workforce have education only up to SPM qualifications, Malaysia’s equivalent to the O-levels. This is not in line with a high income economy that we aspire to be., We need continuous education ,on-the-job training and re-skilling to benefit from new technologies. And by building a highly skilled workforce where productivity and competitiveness drive growth, the costs of doing business will still be competitive as capital is used more efficiently and with emphasis on quality of workers. This means a reduced dependency on unskilled foreign labour, and greater attention to multi-skilling of employees who can increase productivity. This change will also require that government raise the quality and productivity of its own workforce. I believe we have begun along this path with the Government Transformation Program, amongst others, which will enhance the nation's infrastructure and improve access to quality education.
28. Second, the New Economic Model must include a commitment to Sustainability, not only in our economic activities, but in considering the impact of economic development on our environment and precious natural resources. There is little value in pursuing a future based entirely on wealth creation , Pursuing growth that deplete resources and displace communities will have dire consequences for future generations. This is a false and futile choice. We can have a powerful and dynamic economic approach, but one that protects the nation we love for future generations. High and sustained growth and environmental stewardship can and must go hand-in-hand. As I stated when setting up the NEAC, simply being richer falls far short of my expectations. Not only do I want the Rakyat to earn better but they must also live better. Raising the quality of life must be an integral part of the New Economic Model.
29. Finally, is the New Economic Model Inclusive? We must recognize the imperative that we harness the potential of all Malaysians, and that all share in the proceeds of increased national prosperity.
30. Inclusiveness is a key prerequisite for fostering a sense of belonging and engagement in the NEM. I want to take a moment here to touch on this issue of an inclusive New Economic Model that will ensure that no one is left out in contributing to and sharing in the creation of wealth as we progress. While perfect equality is in reality impossible to achieve in an open, global economy,an inclusive society will ensure that we can narrow inequalities in our nation, help those who need help most and engage all of Malaysia’s talents in our effort to build a competitive economic workforce.
31. Reforming our approach to fully meet these new challenges will require a change in our national mindset. In the short-term, there will be entrenched opposition. Some economic sectors may experience adverse effects. The process of change is never easy, and there will be painful moments. But for the long-term strength of our nation, we cannot afford to duck these issues any longer. If we are to truly tackle inequality and become a beacon of progress in our region, we must bring a sense of urgency to reform. Ladies and gentlemen,AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AS PART OF INCLUSIVENESS .
32. The New Economy Policy launched about forty years ago with its affirmative action policy has served the nation well , balancing the economic growth strategies of our nation with the need to address structural inequalities and promote social harmony. Poverty has been drastically cut, standing today at around 3.7 percent. As a nation we should be proud of this achievement. It is one that many other multi-racial nations would like to emulate. However, we still have an unacceptably large segment of low-income households in Malaysia. We the Government are now dealing with 21st century problems that require fresh 21st century approaches.
33. The NEAC report sets out an approach to tackling poverty and renewing our affirmative action policies for a new and more competitive economic context. This will be part of the public consultation, but the government feels there is merit in much of this proposal and I want to set out the broad parameters here.
34. Our first priority must be to eradicate poverty, irrespective of race. We cannot have the high income, sustainable and inclusive economy we seek when disparities in income are not addressed.
35. So there will be a renewed affirmative action policy in the New Economic Model, with a focus on raising income levels of all disadvantaged groups. It will focus on the needs of all our people – those living in the long houses in Sabah and Sarawak and poor rural households in Semenanjung Malaysia (Peninsular Malaysia), who often feel disconnected from the mainstream economic activity. Fishermen. petty traders.and small farmers also fall under this category . Not forgetting the Orang Asli and low income urban dwellers, eeking out a livelihood in tough economic circumstances. The proposal in the NEAC report suggests a focus on the bottom 40 percent of Malaysia’s income strata – both individually and regionally. These are the disadvantaged groups where special attention is still required.
36. The ultimate goal - in time - is that no Malaysian lives in poverty, that all get the chance to succeed and share in prosperity. While there are those who struggle on low-incomes and in harsh conditions, we will always provide special support to help lift them out of the poverty trap.
37. The New Economic Policy has been a milestone of our society for decades, a policy I have fully supported and admired. Its original objectives are still relevant, but it is time to review its implementation. We will chase the same goals, but transform the way we do things. Our renewed affirmative action policy, therefore, will be built on four principles: - it must be market friendly, - it must be merit based, - it must be transparent and - it must be needs based. 38. For instance, one important consideration will be developing a competitive and transparent tender process, with set and clear rules for the whole Bumiputera community, made of both Malay and other indigenous groups. This is set out as a common-sense enhancement of our policies for a new economic reality and where Inclusiveness is a key component in our new economic model. In practice, this approach will mean greater support for the Bumiputera, a greater support based on needs, not race. The Bumiputera segment still forms the majority in the vulnerable groups by any measure, and while our new approach will help those on low-incomes from any group, it will still largely benefit the Bumiputera community and at same time provide for the disadvantaged of other communities.
39. In assessing the results, fair distribution must encompass the whole spectrum of measuring wealth such as equity ownership, other financial and non-financial assets, and access to wealth creating opportunities such as long-term concessions and contracts. Even in measuring ownership, it should go beyond equity to include other properties, business assets such as retail, landed properties, commercial building, intellectual property and other services as well as managerial positions. A valuable example would be the redevelopment of Kampung Baru, a holistic opportunity of wealth creation and value enhancement that goes deeper and well beyond equity ownership. I have instructed the NEAC to develop a detailed framework to operationalise this new model of affirmative action based on a transparent and market based mechanism to achieve fair distribution of the benefits of a high-income economy.
40. The NEAC report sets out its view that the previous mechanism that concentrated on target setting should now focus on structured and dedicated capacity building investment that allows the Bumiputera to take advantage of new opportunities in the economy. In addition, fair access and opportunities to retraining, upgrading of skills and ability to gain employment will also be emphasized for all Malaysians.
41. This approach builds on our experience in implementing the affirmative action policy over many years. When they are implemented in a transparent, fair and empowering way they will yield better results. But for too long, the implementation of our affirmative action policies has not reached those who needed them the most. There is a perception that the non Bumiputera have not benefitted from the progress made to date although facts and figures show otherwise. Therefore with the new principles of affirmative action stated earlier, we need to change this perception. We can no longer tolerate practices that support the behavior of rent-seeking and patronage, which have long tarnished the altruistic aims of the New Economic Policy. Inclusiveness, where all Malaysians contribute and benefit from economic growth - must be a fundamental element of any new economic approach.
42. These are the principles I want to see guide this next phase of consultation. Can we build a new model that creates a high wage, sustainable and inclusive economy where together we prosper? I believe we are within striking distance. I believe there is widespread support for it across Malaysia. And I believe - knowing the ingenuity and creativity of the Malaysian people and Malaysian businesses - we can and will make such aspirations our national economic reality.Ladies and gentlemen,FROM PRINCIPLES TO A PLAN
43. The question then becomes: how do we get there? The work of the government and the NEAC is far from over with this initial report. This is a two stage approach. We must now ensure a robust and thorough consultation and then the development of a detailed blueprint or roadmap on how the New Economic Model and accompanying economic reforms are to be implemented. For instance, working groups akin to the labs that drive development of the NKRA Government Transformation Program will be held, made up of participants from both the public and private sectors to drive the strategies behind the new economic model, culminating in a second report that is a detailed transformation roadmap. We will, in effect, develop an Economic Transformation Program to deliver on this new economic model.
44. To achieve this transformation, the NEAC has set out a series of strategic reform initiatives.
45. The eight Strategic Reform Initiatives focus on:-
1) Re-energising the private sector to lead growth;
2) Developing a quality workforce and reducing dependency on foreign labour;
3) Creating a competitive domestic economy;
4) Strengthening the public sector;
5) Putting in place transparent and market friendly affirmative action;
6) Building knowledge base infrastructure;
7) Enhancing the sources of growth; and
8) Ensuring sustainability of growth.
46. All eight initiatives are complementary and cross cutting in their impact over all sectors of the economy. All three goals of the NEM require that we achieve significantly higher growth rates in GDP in the next decade. As such, several of the policies we must pursue relate to the foundational issues, to enable accelerating the growth momentum through a holistic approach to remove all barriers. They emphasize the need for capacity building rather than just nation building as the sustainable way forward.
47. Adding to the NEAC report, what I would like to suggest is to focus our efforts effectively by targeting specific key sectors, or what I would call the National Key Economic Activities (NKEAs). These are the areas where our economy has the potential to thrive as we move into the high income bracket. In the past, the government has played a paternalistic role in recommending and promoting the sources of growth that should be undertaken by the private sector. Yes we need to provide some guidance, but we are aware that the government should not be making investment decisions for the private-sector.
48. Based on the NEAC new approach that the private sector should drive growth, the government needs to enhance its role as the facilitator for industries to flourish. The majority of the initiatives that have been set out deal with all that is imperative to set the economy right – to remove distortions, barriers and impediments that hinder our economy from progressing up the value chain and to promote healthy competition. Implementing these policies is a pre-condition to successfully tapping new sources of growth. As long as these barriers remain, the growth opportunities in all sectors will not be realized.
49. The NEAC – with the input from across the private sector – has identified key sectors that can be leaders in generating high growth rates. Sectors where our nation is competitive, has a wealth of expertise, the opportunity to leverage specialisation and has gained first mover advantages, as well the traditional comparative advantages. There is much work to be done, but the potential upside requires us to place a focus on these key sectors. Ladies and gentlemen,
50. Mirroring the process we followed for the Government Transformation Program and its National Key Results Areas, I am committed to undertake a thorough consultation process with all the stakeholders, and ensure the National Key Economic Activities will be selected with the sole criteria of Malaysia’s best interest. The NEAC will work with PEMANDU to develop the NKEAs. They will consult the Rakyat and all other stakeholders and, when the 10th Malaysia Plan will be unveiled together with the NKEAs, a special Economic Delivery Unit will be established to spearhead the reform process and finalise and implement the NKEAs. There is still a lot of work to be done to identify a successful strategy for execution and the NKEAs to focus on, but, as a mere indication of what may come in the future, let me give you a few examples of the possibilities we are looking at:
51. In the Electrical and Electronic sector, Malaysia can leverage its early mover advantage. Building on a strong foundation, Malaysia’s future in this sector must be focused not only in manufacturing but in research and development and design, where Malaysian companies are driving innovation rather than simply importing it. Among the measures we must consider incentives for high-value research and support for SMEs supplying larger firms on a larger scale basis.
52. Resource based industries in the palm oil and oil and gas sector continue to be emphasized. In the palm oil sector, strengthening research initiatives should lead to indigenous technology that better meets market demand, such as healthy fats and oils, biofuel from biomass, cosmetics and bio-degradable plastics.
53. In oil and gas, we have one of our nation’s most visible and valued champions in Petronas. It has built a strong brand internationally, and I believe now we must also help drive growth here in Malaysia with even greater support for local suppliers as it grows. Beyond the core oil and gas sector, however, Malaysia’s international energy expertise can help companies in this industry and beyond expand internationally by sharing its know-how, partnering on international bids and offering support on a truly global scale. The strength of having a well-developed pool of local talent and companies which are able to compete globally gives us a lead advantage.
54. In services, the tourism sector has not been exploited to its potential. More can be done to attract new markets from Europe and the Americas to complement the markets from the United Kingdom and Asia. We have some of the oldest forests in the world, rich with flora and fauna and diving experiences acclaimed to be unforgettable. Malaysia can lead in providing environmentally sustainable eco-tourism adventures that are much sought after by the advanced markets. We should aim to provide services which will attract high-end tourists who seek exclusiveness and high value services. We must also be creative as we consider new areas of tourism. From medical tourism – a high-potential growth sector – to eco-tourism, luxury market tourism and visitors related to our growth as a regional education hub. Malaysia’s tourism future is bright if we have the vision and creativity to support its diverse growth potential.
55. As an agriculture producing nation that is also heavily reliant on imports of food, there is a strategic need to focus on expansion of the high value agriculture sector. There is potential to create value in rural space through large-scale agriculture, higher yield methods, new technologies, better linkages to the marketplace that will result in greater production and income. We must also promote agro businesses through integrated and modern agriculture practices.. Given that the Bumiputera community is large in rural areas in both Peninsular Malaysia and Sabah and Sarawak, an intensified expansion of modernised agriculture activities can contribute both to higher incomes and to the reduction in income inequality. And to compete globally, we must commit Malaysia’s agricultural sector to cultivation and processes that meet, and exceed international standards and best practices, as well as marketing on an international scale.
56. Malaysia also has the potential to embrace a leadership role in green technology and develop a niche in high value green industries and services. We have on the ground expertise in complex manufacturing, and are early movers in the region’s solar and alternative energy sectors. And with recent success in commercialization of natural bio-diversity into high value products which are gaining traction among environmentally conscious consumers, Malaysia can become a green hub all the way along the business development continuum – from research to design to manufacturing to commercialization, we have the skills and the public sector’s support. 57. There are many areas that Malaysia can explore to expand the sources of growth. I would like to mention another example--the financial services industry, which is both a growth sector as well as an enabler to growth of other sectors. Its growth potential is seen in Islamic financial services, as well as in the derivatives for risk management by local and regional players. Malaysia is now a world leader in Islamic finance, capital market and the takaful industries. We see the potential to become a hub for integrated Islamic financial services. For instance, Bank Negara Malaysia is currently finalizing the establishment of a physical Islamic financial centre and the imminent approval of two mega Islamic banks licences.
58. Competition is no longer only between nations but also between cities. For Malaysia to move into a higher income economy, we must exploit higher returns by adopting strategies to build density, develop clusters and specialize in high value sectors. Recognising this role, cites such as Kuala Lumpur and Johore Baru which includes Iskandar Malaysia must be developed to be more livable and be able to attract talent and be part and parcel of a more comprehensive and integrated urban-rural planning. We must develop stronger clusters that serve as incubators for start up companies, ensure shared services and develop more businesses and university linkages. Evidence shows that development of cities helped raise incomes of surrounding rural areas especially when they are integrated into the supply chain network.
59. There are many more sectors of strategic growth where Malaysia has the potential to flourish. We have strengths in the IT industry. The creative industries – our music, film, arts and cultural expertise – can be an important sector in Malaysia’s future. And with a strong base of medical, scientific and manufacturing expertise, we can be a regional home for the fast-growing biotechnology and life sciences sectors.
60. So I call on Malaysian companies, investors and entrepreneurs - to seize the opportunities before us and become regional and even global champions. We must have concerted policy intervention to turn this into reality. Companies that show innovation and foresight to reshape and revitalize their activities would have unprecedented prospects to be world leaders in the future. Ladies and gentlemen,PUBLIC-PRIVATE COOPERATION
61. If Malaysia is to achieve its goals, we must build a strong, solid and strategically demand driven market that connects sectors of growth to the ambitious goals I have set out for our New Economic Model. I have already touched on many of the strategies I believe we will require, including modernization of our education system to build a world-class workforce; prudent fiscal reforms that bring greater balance to our revenue and expenditure framework; and market-friendly affirmative action designed to ensure that all Malaysians benefit from this new approach.
62. But underlying all of these strategies must be a new and clear understanding of the respective roles of business and the government. The government is an enabler of wealth-creation. Our role is to ensure stability, openness and fairness in a secure environment that facilitates, rather than distorts or hinders, growth. Competition should be promoted to allow dynamic and efficient markets, and where appropriate, public sector support is needed, we should be there to help. We have also seen in the past 18 months - more clearly than ever - the need for governments to be vigilant in safeguarding economic stability when markets fail.
63. I look around this room today and I see some of the finest private sector talent in the world. You are the torchbearers of wealth creation and growth. We will be active in protecting the interests of the Malaysian economy and the Malaysian people, but we want private sector expertise and investment to flourish. Again, to succeed in a different economic context, we need to look at doing things differently.
64. One of these changes must be a new approach that expands the role of capital markets under our new economic model. Malaysia will not be successful - even in our key sectors - if we simply maintain the status quo. Sparking growth means cultivating innovation, risk-taking and creativity in development of new products or services.
65. Hence, in order to facilitate Malaysia's new economic model, support private sector innovation and to stimulate financing in the higher-risk services and knowledge driven sectors that are critical to Malaysia's future, I would like to see an expanded role for our capital markets, evolving from a primarily fundraising model to a liquidity-driven and risk-diversification model that encourages entrepreneurs and investors to be part of Malaysia's exciting economic future. 66. The development of our capital markets will be further strengthened in the Second Capital Market Master Plan currently being formulated by the Securities Commission, but I also see the acceleration of capital market industries such as the fund management, venture capital and private equity sectors as a crucial part of our drive to create the high wage, high skill economy of Malaysia's future.
67. Related to this issue, the Employees Provident Fund presently dominates local equity and bond markets with up to 50 percent of daily Bursa volume represented by EPF related trades, a situation that is not healthy for the market or for the EPF. Today I can announce that the EPF will be allowed to invest more assets overseas, both diversifying its portfolio and creating more room domestically for new participants. EPF presently has about 6 percent of assets invested offshore and this will increase significantly. EPF will also increase its direct investments in the real economy of Malaysia, as an alternative to market investments – taking positions in healthcare, commodities, property and other long-term investments that match EPF’s requirements to protect the real rate of return on its assets.
68. On the institutional front, the Malaysian Industrial Development Authority (MIDA) is the principal Government agency responsible for the promotion and facilitation of investments in the manufacturing and services sectors in Malaysia. MIDA has been instrumental in the nation’s transformation under different phases of industrial development over the last four decades and has emerged as a well recognised institution among both foreign and domestic investors. However, the time has come for key changes in MIDA in order to make it a more effective investment promotion agency.
69. I am pleased to announce that MIDA will be corporatized to give it the necessary organisational flexibility to attract and retain the manpower and talents it needs in order to be an internationally competitive national investment promotion agency. The Government has also agreed to empower MIDA with the necessary authority to negotiate directly with investors for targeted projects. In addition, MIDA will also be designated as the central investment promotion agency for the manufacturing and services sectors, excluding utilities and financial services, to enhance the coordination and cohesion among the various investment promotion bodies in the country. These changes will enable MIDA to approve incentives in real time and act swiftly to engage investors more effectively. Finally, MIDA will be renamed as the Malaysian Investment Development Authority while maintaining its acronym, MIDA, which is a well known brand name.
70. In addition to this important institutional reform, I believe that we need to look anew at ensuring an appropriate balance between government, GLCs and the private sector in our economy as part of this new economic model. In the years prior to the Asian financial crisis, the private sector contribution to GDP far outstripped that of the public sector, but in the first decade of the new century, the statistics have been reversed. What started as a cyclical necessity of fiscal pump priming has hardened into a dependency and an unsustainable structural condition.
71. I have touched on many of the key principles that will underpin this recalibration of the public-private sector relationship: government reforms to reduce bureaucracy and focus on creating a growth-enabling environment; encouragement and incentives to spur private sector innovation and productivity; a focus on strategic knowledge sectors of long-term growth; and a recognition of the crucial importance that pursuing opportunities in regional and global markets will play in Malaysia’s growth.Ladies and gentlemen,
72. At this venue last year, I outlined a strategy that would see GLCs proceed to dispose of non-core assets; to catalyse and develop the eco-systems of their core sectors; and, to compete on a level playing field with the private sector. Building upon the third principle, I mentioned that Government Linked Investment Companies (GLICs) should be allowed to divest non-core and/or non-competitive assets.
73. Today I want to announce further steps that will enhance private sector opportunities and appropriately recalibrate the relationship between the public and private sectors.
74. Going forward, I would like to see GLCs and Government holding agencies pursuing strategic collaborations with private sources of capital in Malaysia in order to provide prospective investors with exposure to the government order book and build national competencies. These coalitions will not only drive the regionalization strategy of Malaysian companies which is vital given the size of the domestic market, but also ensure ready pools of capital are in place and available for quick deployment. In addition, the opportunity to form partnerships with a wider range of co-investors including retail investors, local and foreign mutual funds remains open. If successfully implemented on a large scale, these catalytic coalitions could become a unique form of Public Private Partnership. We already have initiatives moving in this direction. Examples include the upcoming privatisation of Astro and the partnership between Malakoff and Tenaga Nasional on a utilities project in Saudi Arabia.
75. We have made progress in the area of divesting non-core assets and Khazanah alone has over the course of the last nine months divested significant stakes in Tenaga Nasional, Malaysia Airports and PLUS for the purpose of increasing the liquidity of these counters. But more such progress in this area must be made.
76. We will be pursuing further such divestments of non-core and non competitive assets that operate in areas where new strategic shareholders have the potential to enhance the creation of value, as compared to them being left within the government stable. Of course, we must ensure that any such divestments stand up to rigorous checks to ensure that they are in the public interest.
77. A transparent process will be implemented to ensure that potential private sector bidders meet a minimum set of criteria, including financial standing, track record in business expansion and management excellence, and that their proposals help grow the Bumiputera and 1Malaysia causes. The bidders will have to demonstrate delivery against set benchmarks of innovation and value creation, and support the goals of the New Economic Model – high wages, inclusiveness and sustainability. To develop these processes, I propose evaluation panels consisting of financial professionals, international industry experts and senior Government officials be appointed to assess private sector bids for GLC-related assets.
. And because it is so important that public and private sector performance are each enhanced, we will be vigilant in ensuring that transfer of GLC assets into the private sector does not compromise our goals for public sector reform and delivery, or lead to asset stripping that runs counter to the public interest. For a predetermined period of time, this may include the retention of key management and the prevention of involuntary staff layoffs. Equally, I recognize the importance of reviewing existing tariffs and incentives available to GLCs if we are to attract private sector investment, and I propose that any such reviews are taken up at the Cabinet.
79. With clear guidelines and strategic principles in place, I can say that the journey on GLC transformation continues to maintain its momentum, and I can go further today with the announcement that Khazanah has resolved to divest its controlling 32 percent stake in POS Malaysia through a two-stage strategic divestment process. In the first stage, that begins immediately, proper corporate governance and regulatory processes will be adhered to. A full consultation with the various stakeholders will be undertaken. POS Malaysia will be prepared for the strategic divestment by addressing various aspects of its business environment including its regulatory structure, usage of government controlled land and the position and welfare of its employees. The long outstanding matter of low income of some of the staff including postmen will be reviewed. To ensure both public and commercial interests are balanced, the government will undertake a comprehensive review and update the regulatory framework of the postal system.In stage two, Khazanah will draw up a bidding and evaluation process to select a new and entreprenuerial shareholder to further modernize POS Malaysia. Further details of this exercise will be announced later.
80. To promote higher levels of economic investment, expansion and growth, several parcels of land in Jalan Stonor, Jalan Ampang, Jalan Lidcol, Kuala Lumpur have been identified to be tendered out and developed by the private sector. This asset, if not developed will be wasteful and the Government will incur cost of maintaining it. This initiative will be a good kick-off for more outright sale and joint ventures between the public and private sectors in land development. In this regard, I would like to inform you that Government of Malaysia and the EPF will form a joint-venture to promote the development of 3,000 acres of land in Sungei Buloh into a new hub for the Klang Valley. This will lead to over RM5 billion of new investments being made that will have an immediate effect on domestic growth, with an enormous potential for the private sector to participate in prominently.
81. I can also share with you today that we will gradually reduce public sector involvement in activities that compete directly with the private sector. We have begun a review of a number of companies under Minister of Finance Incorporated and other agencies, and I can inform you that we are considering privatization measures related to, Percetakan Nasional Malaysia Berhad, CTRM Aero Composites Sdn Bhd, Nine Bio Sdn Bhd and Innobio Sdn Bhd with more under consideration
82. In addition, Petronas has already identified two sizable subsidiaries with good track records to be listed this year. These initiatives have the goal to reduce the Government’s presence directly or indirectly in business activities that are best carried out by the private sector and are a clear signal of our commitment to promoting competition in the economy, risk taking and long-term economic growth that benefits all Malaysians.
83. As I have stressed today, we cannot afford to slip back to the status quo. The challenge that stands before us requires an urgent need to review the way things are being done. Institutions, approaches and systems that have worked well in the past may need to be altered to suit the changing global landscape.
84. The announcements I have made today – on new divestments, public and private partnerships, and a renewal of government processes to spark growth – are a sign of our commitment to reform and position our country, our workforce, our companies and our future generations for the challenges of a competitive global economy.Ladies and gentlemen,CLOSING 85. In my first days as Prime Minister, I said that Malaysia must be open to change. We have no alternative but to move forward and become a high income country with sustainable and inclusive growth. Change can be painful and short-cuts will be tempting. But we cannot seek only the quick wins. This will be a journey that may cause some short-term pain, but will pay off in a stronger Malaysian future. We need to have a sustained and consistent 'big push' if the reforms set out today are to gain momentum and help achieve our goals.
86. In this regard, this is a defining moment for Malaysia. As we emerge from a global recession, will we have the courage and the vision to pursue an ambitious agenda for change that can seem daunting, but is essential for our nation's future? Our answer is to create high wage jobs, give our children the best educational opportunities, and attract the high quality investment that is the driving theme of this important gathering.
87. At this critical juncture, where we balance our nation’s history with its future, I believe we do have the courage to meet Malaysia’s hopes and ambitions.
88. But this is about far more than the economic goals of our nation. This is about the life chances open to future generations. This is about raising the sights of low-income families to help them out of poverty. This is about the very fabric of our society where we each have opportunities and responsibilities. It’s about placing Malaysia at the forefront of a high-income economy so that we can stand shoulder to shoulder with other fully developed nations. I am confident - with your support - we will choose the right path, move forward, not back, and build a fairer, stronger and dynamic Malaysia for many decades to come. I call upon you to join me in this momentous journey to build a truly prosperous and a new future for 1Malaysia.
Thank You.
Wabillahittaufik walhidayah,Wassalamualaikum warahmatullahi wabarakatuh.
Selasa, 30 Mac 2010
Khamis, 11 Februari 2010
We are paying more...Y? We are not a rich...Are we? Maybe.......Most probably.....
BMW 535i sells for RM178,000 in the USIn the United States of America (a developed country which we are also aspiring to become by the year 2020) a 2009 model BMW 535i Sedan is selling for about USD50,367.00. This is only RM178,000 - about the price of a Toyota Camry 2..4L here in Malaysia . The same BMW sells in Malaysia for about RM450,000.BMW 328i sells for RM155,000 in the USThe 2009 model BMW 328i 2 door Convertible sells for USD44,014 or RM155,369.00 in the US . In Malaysia the same car sells for overRM460,000. This is an untenable situation. Audi A4 2.0T Cabriolet Convertible sells for RM142,000 in the USThe 2009 model Audi A4 2 Door 2.0T Cabriolet Convertible sells in the US for USD40,328.00 or RM142,357. In Malaysia the same car would sell for about RM265,000.VW GTI 2.0T sells for RM85,000 in the USIn the US the 2009 model Volkswagen GTI 2.0T sells for USD 24,039 or RM85,000 only. In China the same car will cost around RM60,000. Over here the same VW car sells for about RM200,000. And the 2010 model Toyota Camry 2.4L sells in the US for USD 19,659.00 or RM69,396 In Malaysia the 2008 Toyota Camry 2.4L sells for RM170,000. Toyota Camry 2.4L, 2010 model. RM69,000 in the USCar prices in Malaysia are about three times higher than the prices in the United States .. We are a developing nation. Our land and labour costs are so much cheaper than the US . Why are our cars so expensive? It does not make any sense. Tak masuk akal.Then here are some car prices from our neighbour Indonesia . The Toyota Altis sells in Indonesia for about RM46,000. The same car sells here for around RM 112,000. Again we are three times more expensive than Indonesia The Honda Jazz sells here for RM108,000.. In Indonesia the Jazz sells for RM 36,000. Three times more expensive.We are paying ridiculously high prices .We are paying the highest car prices in the world to support the Proton and other locally made cars as well as support a mind boggling AP policy . 26 million Malaysians have to pay three times more for their cars just to support Proton and 120,000 people who are directly and indirectly involved in the motor sector in Malaysia and the AP holders. That is a ratio of 216:1.This ratio of 216:1 is too skewed. 26.0 million happier people can contribute many more votes than 120,000 members of an inefficient motor industry. This is truncated : Muhyiddin assures govt support for automotive parts and component sector1.
KUALA LUMPUR, May 26 - The deputy prime minister said special focus will be given to "facilitate and encourage" the development of the automotive parts and component sector despite the current global and regional economic downturn.2. "Under the CEPT and Asean Trade in Goods Agreements, Malaysia has agreed to eliminate import duties on all products in the Normal Track on January 1, 2010. This includes motor vehicles, auto parts and components," he said.3. He pointed out that the motor vehicle sub sector in Malaysia will not be directly impacted because of its heavy dependence on the domestic market.4. "The Malaysian government recognises the contribution of the domestic automotive industry towards the development of the country."Para 2 sounds promising but then Para 3 and 4 basically says that the Malaysian motor car industry will continue to be protected. This means we will continue paying the highest car prices in the world for automobiles.Cuba kita kira : kalau kereta Honda Jazz di jual dengan harga yang sebenarnya (lebih kurang RM36,000 saja) dan bukan pada harga sekarang (RM108,000) maksudnya bayaran bulanan pembeli kereta akan jadi kurang, mungkin sepertiga sahaja daripada bayaran bulanan sekarang.Jika sekarang orang bayar RM1,500 sebulan untuk beli Honda Jazz, kalau harga kereta lebih menepati harga pasaran dunia, orang kita perlu bayar sekitar RM500 saja sebulan.Maksudnya tanpa Kerajaan perlu membuat apa pun (merangsang ekonomi, belanja berpuluh billion Ringgit duit rakyat untuk stimulus dan sebagainya) setiap rakyat Malaysia yang membeli kereta yang seharga dengan Honda Jazz akan dapat menjimatkan sehingga RM1,000 sebulan daripada kos sara hidup bulanannya.This is like giving the car buyer an RM1000 pay rise without incurring any extra costs for the taxpayer, the Government or the economy. It will greatly reduce the cost of living in Malaysia and spur greater economic growth too.Some folks said the other day that Proton has 150 major component suppliers, dealers, distributors and about 500 other parts suppliers too. Of the 150 major component suppliers, about 15 of them are listed companies. In total they employ about 120,000 people. The Proton supply chain is a mix of bumiputras and non bumiputras. But here is a sad fact : none of them are operating at their level best efficiency.Our motor car policy is forcing Malaysians to subsidise Proton so that Proton can sustain major inefficiencies in the Malaysian economy.. This is not a good thing at all.We have to unwind this situation. Set a target of 18 months from now to unwind all protection for our motor industry. Remove the impoverishing AP policy also in 18 months. Let Malaysian car prices reflect world market prices for the same makes of cars.If a BMW 535 sells for RM178,000 in America , it should sell for a little less here in Malaysia (our rentals and salaries are cheaper).
KUALA LUMPUR, May 26 - The deputy prime minister said special focus will be given to "facilitate and encourage" the development of the automotive parts and component sector despite the current global and regional economic downturn.2. "Under the CEPT and Asean Trade in Goods Agreements, Malaysia has agreed to eliminate import duties on all products in the Normal Track on January 1, 2010. This includes motor vehicles, auto parts and components," he said.3. He pointed out that the motor vehicle sub sector in Malaysia will not be directly impacted because of its heavy dependence on the domestic market.4. "The Malaysian government recognises the contribution of the domestic automotive industry towards the development of the country."Para 2 sounds promising but then Para 3 and 4 basically says that the Malaysian motor car industry will continue to be protected. This means we will continue paying the highest car prices in the world for automobiles.Cuba kita kira : kalau kereta Honda Jazz di jual dengan harga yang sebenarnya (lebih kurang RM36,000 saja) dan bukan pada harga sekarang (RM108,000) maksudnya bayaran bulanan pembeli kereta akan jadi kurang, mungkin sepertiga sahaja daripada bayaran bulanan sekarang.Jika sekarang orang bayar RM1,500 sebulan untuk beli Honda Jazz, kalau harga kereta lebih menepati harga pasaran dunia, orang kita perlu bayar sekitar RM500 saja sebulan.Maksudnya tanpa Kerajaan perlu membuat apa pun (merangsang ekonomi, belanja berpuluh billion Ringgit duit rakyat untuk stimulus dan sebagainya) setiap rakyat Malaysia yang membeli kereta yang seharga dengan Honda Jazz akan dapat menjimatkan sehingga RM1,000 sebulan daripada kos sara hidup bulanannya.This is like giving the car buyer an RM1000 pay rise without incurring any extra costs for the taxpayer, the Government or the economy. It will greatly reduce the cost of living in Malaysia and spur greater economic growth too.Some folks said the other day that Proton has 150 major component suppliers, dealers, distributors and about 500 other parts suppliers too. Of the 150 major component suppliers, about 15 of them are listed companies. In total they employ about 120,000 people. The Proton supply chain is a mix of bumiputras and non bumiputras. But here is a sad fact : none of them are operating at their level best efficiency.Our motor car policy is forcing Malaysians to subsidise Proton so that Proton can sustain major inefficiencies in the Malaysian economy.. This is not a good thing at all.We have to unwind this situation. Set a target of 18 months from now to unwind all protection for our motor industry. Remove the impoverishing AP policy also in 18 months. Let Malaysian car prices reflect world market prices for the same makes of cars.If a BMW 535 sells for RM178,000 in America , it should sell for a little less here in Malaysia (our rentals and salaries are cheaper).
Surat Penjelasan JPJ mengenai cermin gelap kereta import
Khidmat Pelanggan : #241907
Tuan,
Dengan hormatnya saya diarah merujuk kepada aduan tuan berhubung “JPJ HARUS MESRA PENGGUNA BERHUBUNG ISU CERMIN GELAP” bertarikh 26 Januari 2010.Sukacita dimaklumkan bahawa, Jabatan ini mengambil maklum dan mengucapkan ribuan terima kasih di atas keprihatinan tuan dalam isu cermin gelap. Untuk makluman tuan, peraturan mengenai cermin gelap diperuntukkan di bawah Kaedah-Kaedah Kenderaan Motor (Larangan Mengenai Jenis Kaca Tertentu) 1991. Di dalam kaedah tersebut menyatakan bahawa cermin hadapan perlu telus cahaya sebanyak 70% tetapi 20% daripada bahagian paling atas cermin hadapan tersebut adalah dikecualikan manakala cermin-cermin sisi hadapan dan belakang serta cermin belakang perlu telus cahaya sebanyak 50%. Ini bermakna, pemilik-pemilik kenderaan dibenarkan untuk menggelapkan cermin kenderaan mereka tetapi mengikut kadar ketelusan cahaya sebagaimana yang ditetapkan.Sebagai makluman tuan, peraturan cermin gelap yang diguna pakai di peringkat antarabangsa adalah di bawah Reg.43 UNECE. Peraturan ini memperuntukkan cermin hadapan perlu telus cahaya sebanyak 75% dan tiada pengecualian kepada mana-mana bahagian kaca hadapan tersebut, cermin sisi pemandu dan sebelah pemandu perlu telus cahaya sebanyak 70% manakala cermin sisi belakang dan cermin belakang tidak dinyatakan tahap ketelusan cahaya kerana ia bergantung kepada persetujuan pengeluar kenderaan tersebut untuk meletakkan tahap ketelusan. Biasanya ia di nyatakan dengan simbol V. Contohnya: V30 bermakna tahap ketelusan yang dipersetujui oleh pengeluar kenderaan tersebut adalah sebanyak 30%.
Untuk makluman tuan juga, di negara-negara yang menjadi ahli kepada WP29 (World Harmonization For Vehicle Regulation) iaitu yang mengguna pakai Reg.43 UNECE, pengeluar kenderaan adalah bertanggungjawab kepada tahap ketelusan cahaya dan juga bertanggungjawab sekiranya berlaku kemalangan akibat daripada cermin gelap yang dipersetujuinya. Oleh sebab itu, terdapat perjanjian yang ditandatangani bersama di antara pengeluar kenderaan dan pihak insuran mengenai fasal kemalangan yang diakibatkan oleh cermin gelap tersebut. Malaysia telah pun menjadi ahli kepada WP29 tersebut dan telah menerima pakai peraturan-peraturan tersebut secara berperingkat. Di dalam perkara berhubung cermin gelap, Malaysia masih belum dapat melaksanakan peraturan tersebut sebagaimana negara-negara luar kerana pengeluar kenderaan masih belum ada perjanjian bersama dengan pihak insuran berkenaan fasal kemalangan dan pihak yang bertanggungjawab terhadap kadar ketelusan cermin gelap.Berhubung perkara ada pihak yang dibenarkan untuk memasang cermin gelap, di dalam kaedah-kaedah kenderaan motor (Larangan Mengenai Jenis Kaca Tertentu) 1991 ada memperuntukkan mengenai pengecualian terhadap kenderaan yang digunakan untuk Yang di Pertuan Agong dan Permaisuri Agong, Sultan dan Sultanah, Hakim Mahkamah Agung dan Mahkamah Tinggi, pegawai polis atau pegawai tentera yang dinyatakan oleh Ketua Polis Negara atau Ketua Turus Angkatan Tentera. Kaedah tersebut juga memperuntukkan kuasa kepada Menteri untuk memberi pengecualian secara bertulis kepada mana-mana orang. Menteri Pengangkutan telah membuat garis panduan bahawa sesiapa yang memenuhi syarat dan benar-benar perlu boleh diberi pengecualian daripada peraturan kaca gelap. Faktor-faktor yang akan dipertimbangkan adalah berdasarkan isu keselamatan dan kesihatan.Bagi faktor keselamatan, pemohon perlu menulis surat kepada Ketua Polis Negeri mereka dan membuktikan terdapat isu keselamatan terhadap diri mereka atau keluarga mereka kerana kedudukan, pangkat, harta, persengketaan atau pernah menerima ancaman dan sebagainya. Di atas sokongan daripada Ketua Polis Negeri, Ketua Pengarah JPJ akan mempertimbangkan permohonan untuk kelulusan sebagaimana arahan daripada Menteri.
Bagi faktor kesihatan pula, pemohon perlu membuktikan bahawa mereka mempunyai penyakit yang tidak boleh terdedah kepada sinaran matahari sama ada penyakit mata atau kulit dan sedang mendapatkan rawatan di hospital atau klinik kerajaan dan laporan perubatan disahkan oleh doktor pakar di dalam bidang yang berkenaan. Penyakit yang dinyatakan mestilah merupakan salah satu penyakit yang terdapat di dalam senarai yang dikeluarkan oleh Kementerian Kesihatan tergolong dalam penyakit yang tidak boleh terdedah kepada sinaran matahari bagi membolehkan permohonan tersebut dipertimbangkan untuk kelulusan.JPJ sememangnya mesra pengguna berhubung cermin gelap kerana apabila sesuatu kenderaan dikesan menggunakan cermin gelap, pemilik hanya diberi Notis PG1 iaitu notis larangan penggunaan kenderaan bagi membolehkan pemilik menanggalkan filem/plastik hitam atau menukar kepada cermin cerah dalam masa sepuluh hari. Kenderaan tersebut perlu dibawa ke mana-mana JPJ berhampiran bagi mempastikan pemilik telah mematuhi peraturan dan membolehkan notis larangan ditarik balik. Notis saman tidak dikeluarkan kepada pemilik yang dikesan menggunakan cermin gelap kecuali kepada pemilik yang enggan mematuhi notis larangan tersebut. Untuk makluman tuan juga, Jabatan Pengangkutan Jalan pernah berhasrat untuk menurunkan kadar ketelusan di mana cermin hadapan perlu telus cahaya sebanyak 70% manakala cermin-cermin sisi hadapan dan belakang serta cermin belakang perlu telus cahaya sebanyak 40%.
Namun demikian, setelah Menteri Pengangkutan mengadakan perbincangan dengan Ketua Polis Negara, banyak isu-isu penguatkuasaan yang perlu dipertimbangkan dan ditangani sekiranya kadar ketelusan sedia ada diturunkan.Di antara isu yang di bangkitkan adalah:(a) Menyukarkan pihak Polis Di Raja Malaysia (PDRM) dalam usaha menangani jenayah terutamanya yang melibatkan rompakan bersenjata, curi kenderaan, penculikan dan sebagainya. Cermin kenderaan yang terlalu gelap tentunya akan mendatangkan kesusahan kepada pihak PDRM di dalam tugas mereka mengenal pasti identiti pemandu dan penumpang serta barangan yang dibawa. b) Menimbulkan kesusahan untuk mengesan pesalah-pesalah trafik terutamanya yang tidak memakai tali pinggang keledar keselamatan, pemandu dalam keadaan mabuk, memandu sambil menggunakan telefon bimbit, memandu sambil meriba bayi atau anak kecil dan sebagainya.c) Menyebabkan bahaya kepada pemanduan dan keselamatan di jalan raya kerana cermin gelap boleh mengelirukan pandangan sebenar pemandu terutamanya sewaktu hujan lebat dan pada waktu malam khususnya di tempat-tempat yang tidak mempunyai lampu jalan yang mana boleh mengakibatkan kemalangan. Kajian mengenai keselamatan pemanduan yang dilakukan oleh institusi-institusi keselamatan jalan raya diperingkat antarabangsa mendapati bahawa dalam keadaan biasa terdapat “blind spot” di mana pemandu tak dapat melihat kenderaan yang berada di lorong sebelah belakang kenderaannya, apa lagi jika kenderaan bercermin gelap. Pemandu yang memandu dibelakang kenderaan yang bercermin gelap juga akan jadi resah kerana tidak nampak apa yang ada di hadapan.(d) Menggalakkan berlakunya pecah kenderaan terutamanya kenderaan mewah yang bercermin gelap kerana penjenayah mungkin beranggapan ada sesuatu yang berharga yang diletakkan di dalam kenderaan.Mengenai usul tuan tentang kesalahan-kesalahan lain yang mengundang kepada kemalangan jalan raya seperti tayar botak serta sikap pemandu sememangnya menjadi kesalahan utama yang dikenakan mata demerit dan boleh menyebabkan pemandu digantung atau dibatalkan lesen memandunya.
Modifikasi terhadap enjin tanpa kelulusan juga merupakan suatu kesalahan di bawah peraturan Kaedah-kaedah Pembinaan dan Kegunaan.Untuk makluman tuan seterusnya, JPJ tidak pernah memberi kelulusan kepada bas ekspres untuk memasang cermin gelap. Peraturan yang sama adalah terpakai kepada bas ekspres. Sebelum ini, Kementerian Pelancongan meminta kerjasama Kementerian Pengangkutan Malaysia untuk tidak mengambil tindakan ke atas bas-bas ekspres sempena tahun melawat Malaysia yang di lanjutkan sehingga tahun lepas. Mengenai perbandingan dengan negara-negara maju, mereka di iktiraf sebagai negara maju bukan sahaja kerana kemajuan perindustrian dan ekomoni, malah kerana sikap dan mentaliti rakyat mereka juga adalah jauh lebih tinggi dari negara-negara membangun seperti Malaysia. Contohnya, di Jepun dan Eropah, kesedaran mengenai keselamatan sememangnya menjadi perkara utama di dalam kehidupan harian mereka. Pemandu akan memakai tali pinggang keledar keselamatan sebaik sahaja bersedia untuk memandu, anak-anak mereka dididik untuk memakai tali pinggang keledar keselamatan di tempat duduk belakang dan ia telah diimplimentasikan semenjak tahun 70-an tanpa perlu dikuatkuasakan oleh badan penguatkuasa trafik kerana mereka mempunyai kesedaran mengenai tanggungjawab menjaga keselamatan. Berbeza keadaannya di Malaysia di mana pemandu dan penumpang hanya akan memasang tali pinggang keledar keselamatan apabila ternampak anggota JPJ atau Polis. Di Eropah malahan juga Singapura, setiap kenderaan mempunyai alat seperti ‘smart tag’ yang ada di negara kita cuma tol mereka tidak mempunyai palang dan tiada siapa yang melakukan kesalahan melepasi tol tersebut jika tidak mempunyai ‘smart tag’ , senario ini amat berbeza sekali dengan negara ini. Ia adalah disebabkan rakyat di negara mereka sentiasa mematuhi setiap undang-undang dan peraturan yang telah ditetapkan. Untuk menuju ke arah itu rakyat Malaysia perlulah menanamkan sikap dan mentaliti yang sebegitu juga.
Untuk makluman tuan, Jabatan ini menguatkuasakan undang-undang dan peraturan di bawah Akta Pengangkutan Jalan 1987 dan Akta Pelesenan Kenderaan Perdagangan 1987 serta Kaedah-kaedah di bawahnya, yang mana ianya telah digubal setelah dibahaskan di Dewan Rakyat dan Dewan Negara serta telah dipersetujui sebelum diwartakan menjadi undang-undang. JPJ sentiasa mengkaji dan mengemaskini Akta dan Kaedah selari dengan keperluan dan kehendak semasa. Mengenai persoalan ‘nombor spray’ atau ‘nombor tidak timbul’ yang tuan utarakan, kenderaan Singapura menggunakan teknik yang mana nombor di emboss di atas plat dan ianya timbul. JPJ juga sedang mengkaji untuk melaksanakan sistem plat pendaftaran seperti Singapura dalam usaha memperketatkan penguatkuasaan sepertimana yang dilaksanakan oleh Singapura.
Sekian terima kasih.
Bahagian Penguatkuasa,
Ibu PejabatJabatan Pengangkutan Jalan
Putrajaya.
P/s : Langsung tak relevan dengan soalan . Soalannya mengapa di Port (pelabuhan) ada JPJ booth tetapi tidak menahan/menyekat kemasukan kereta re-cond yang sememangnya memakai cermin gelap tanpa tinted film . Setelah pengguna beli baru nak sibuk-sibuk nak enforce law...Apa nie?
Tuan,
Dengan hormatnya saya diarah merujuk kepada aduan tuan berhubung “JPJ HARUS MESRA PENGGUNA BERHUBUNG ISU CERMIN GELAP” bertarikh 26 Januari 2010.Sukacita dimaklumkan bahawa, Jabatan ini mengambil maklum dan mengucapkan ribuan terima kasih di atas keprihatinan tuan dalam isu cermin gelap. Untuk makluman tuan, peraturan mengenai cermin gelap diperuntukkan di bawah Kaedah-Kaedah Kenderaan Motor (Larangan Mengenai Jenis Kaca Tertentu) 1991. Di dalam kaedah tersebut menyatakan bahawa cermin hadapan perlu telus cahaya sebanyak 70% tetapi 20% daripada bahagian paling atas cermin hadapan tersebut adalah dikecualikan manakala cermin-cermin sisi hadapan dan belakang serta cermin belakang perlu telus cahaya sebanyak 50%. Ini bermakna, pemilik-pemilik kenderaan dibenarkan untuk menggelapkan cermin kenderaan mereka tetapi mengikut kadar ketelusan cahaya sebagaimana yang ditetapkan.Sebagai makluman tuan, peraturan cermin gelap yang diguna pakai di peringkat antarabangsa adalah di bawah Reg.43 UNECE. Peraturan ini memperuntukkan cermin hadapan perlu telus cahaya sebanyak 75% dan tiada pengecualian kepada mana-mana bahagian kaca hadapan tersebut, cermin sisi pemandu dan sebelah pemandu perlu telus cahaya sebanyak 70% manakala cermin sisi belakang dan cermin belakang tidak dinyatakan tahap ketelusan cahaya kerana ia bergantung kepada persetujuan pengeluar kenderaan tersebut untuk meletakkan tahap ketelusan. Biasanya ia di nyatakan dengan simbol V. Contohnya: V30 bermakna tahap ketelusan yang dipersetujui oleh pengeluar kenderaan tersebut adalah sebanyak 30%.
Untuk makluman tuan juga, di negara-negara yang menjadi ahli kepada WP29 (World Harmonization For Vehicle Regulation) iaitu yang mengguna pakai Reg.43 UNECE, pengeluar kenderaan adalah bertanggungjawab kepada tahap ketelusan cahaya dan juga bertanggungjawab sekiranya berlaku kemalangan akibat daripada cermin gelap yang dipersetujuinya. Oleh sebab itu, terdapat perjanjian yang ditandatangani bersama di antara pengeluar kenderaan dan pihak insuran mengenai fasal kemalangan yang diakibatkan oleh cermin gelap tersebut. Malaysia telah pun menjadi ahli kepada WP29 tersebut dan telah menerima pakai peraturan-peraturan tersebut secara berperingkat. Di dalam perkara berhubung cermin gelap, Malaysia masih belum dapat melaksanakan peraturan tersebut sebagaimana negara-negara luar kerana pengeluar kenderaan masih belum ada perjanjian bersama dengan pihak insuran berkenaan fasal kemalangan dan pihak yang bertanggungjawab terhadap kadar ketelusan cermin gelap.Berhubung perkara ada pihak yang dibenarkan untuk memasang cermin gelap, di dalam kaedah-kaedah kenderaan motor (Larangan Mengenai Jenis Kaca Tertentu) 1991 ada memperuntukkan mengenai pengecualian terhadap kenderaan yang digunakan untuk Yang di Pertuan Agong dan Permaisuri Agong, Sultan dan Sultanah, Hakim Mahkamah Agung dan Mahkamah Tinggi, pegawai polis atau pegawai tentera yang dinyatakan oleh Ketua Polis Negara atau Ketua Turus Angkatan Tentera. Kaedah tersebut juga memperuntukkan kuasa kepada Menteri untuk memberi pengecualian secara bertulis kepada mana-mana orang. Menteri Pengangkutan telah membuat garis panduan bahawa sesiapa yang memenuhi syarat dan benar-benar perlu boleh diberi pengecualian daripada peraturan kaca gelap. Faktor-faktor yang akan dipertimbangkan adalah berdasarkan isu keselamatan dan kesihatan.Bagi faktor keselamatan, pemohon perlu menulis surat kepada Ketua Polis Negeri mereka dan membuktikan terdapat isu keselamatan terhadap diri mereka atau keluarga mereka kerana kedudukan, pangkat, harta, persengketaan atau pernah menerima ancaman dan sebagainya. Di atas sokongan daripada Ketua Polis Negeri, Ketua Pengarah JPJ akan mempertimbangkan permohonan untuk kelulusan sebagaimana arahan daripada Menteri.
Bagi faktor kesihatan pula, pemohon perlu membuktikan bahawa mereka mempunyai penyakit yang tidak boleh terdedah kepada sinaran matahari sama ada penyakit mata atau kulit dan sedang mendapatkan rawatan di hospital atau klinik kerajaan dan laporan perubatan disahkan oleh doktor pakar di dalam bidang yang berkenaan. Penyakit yang dinyatakan mestilah merupakan salah satu penyakit yang terdapat di dalam senarai yang dikeluarkan oleh Kementerian Kesihatan tergolong dalam penyakit yang tidak boleh terdedah kepada sinaran matahari bagi membolehkan permohonan tersebut dipertimbangkan untuk kelulusan.JPJ sememangnya mesra pengguna berhubung cermin gelap kerana apabila sesuatu kenderaan dikesan menggunakan cermin gelap, pemilik hanya diberi Notis PG1 iaitu notis larangan penggunaan kenderaan bagi membolehkan pemilik menanggalkan filem/plastik hitam atau menukar kepada cermin cerah dalam masa sepuluh hari. Kenderaan tersebut perlu dibawa ke mana-mana JPJ berhampiran bagi mempastikan pemilik telah mematuhi peraturan dan membolehkan notis larangan ditarik balik. Notis saman tidak dikeluarkan kepada pemilik yang dikesan menggunakan cermin gelap kecuali kepada pemilik yang enggan mematuhi notis larangan tersebut. Untuk makluman tuan juga, Jabatan Pengangkutan Jalan pernah berhasrat untuk menurunkan kadar ketelusan di mana cermin hadapan perlu telus cahaya sebanyak 70% manakala cermin-cermin sisi hadapan dan belakang serta cermin belakang perlu telus cahaya sebanyak 40%.
Namun demikian, setelah Menteri Pengangkutan mengadakan perbincangan dengan Ketua Polis Negara, banyak isu-isu penguatkuasaan yang perlu dipertimbangkan dan ditangani sekiranya kadar ketelusan sedia ada diturunkan.Di antara isu yang di bangkitkan adalah:(a) Menyukarkan pihak Polis Di Raja Malaysia (PDRM) dalam usaha menangani jenayah terutamanya yang melibatkan rompakan bersenjata, curi kenderaan, penculikan dan sebagainya. Cermin kenderaan yang terlalu gelap tentunya akan mendatangkan kesusahan kepada pihak PDRM di dalam tugas mereka mengenal pasti identiti pemandu dan penumpang serta barangan yang dibawa. b) Menimbulkan kesusahan untuk mengesan pesalah-pesalah trafik terutamanya yang tidak memakai tali pinggang keledar keselamatan, pemandu dalam keadaan mabuk, memandu sambil menggunakan telefon bimbit, memandu sambil meriba bayi atau anak kecil dan sebagainya.c) Menyebabkan bahaya kepada pemanduan dan keselamatan di jalan raya kerana cermin gelap boleh mengelirukan pandangan sebenar pemandu terutamanya sewaktu hujan lebat dan pada waktu malam khususnya di tempat-tempat yang tidak mempunyai lampu jalan yang mana boleh mengakibatkan kemalangan. Kajian mengenai keselamatan pemanduan yang dilakukan oleh institusi-institusi keselamatan jalan raya diperingkat antarabangsa mendapati bahawa dalam keadaan biasa terdapat “blind spot” di mana pemandu tak dapat melihat kenderaan yang berada di lorong sebelah belakang kenderaannya, apa lagi jika kenderaan bercermin gelap. Pemandu yang memandu dibelakang kenderaan yang bercermin gelap juga akan jadi resah kerana tidak nampak apa yang ada di hadapan.(d) Menggalakkan berlakunya pecah kenderaan terutamanya kenderaan mewah yang bercermin gelap kerana penjenayah mungkin beranggapan ada sesuatu yang berharga yang diletakkan di dalam kenderaan.Mengenai usul tuan tentang kesalahan-kesalahan lain yang mengundang kepada kemalangan jalan raya seperti tayar botak serta sikap pemandu sememangnya menjadi kesalahan utama yang dikenakan mata demerit dan boleh menyebabkan pemandu digantung atau dibatalkan lesen memandunya.
Modifikasi terhadap enjin tanpa kelulusan juga merupakan suatu kesalahan di bawah peraturan Kaedah-kaedah Pembinaan dan Kegunaan.Untuk makluman tuan seterusnya, JPJ tidak pernah memberi kelulusan kepada bas ekspres untuk memasang cermin gelap. Peraturan yang sama adalah terpakai kepada bas ekspres. Sebelum ini, Kementerian Pelancongan meminta kerjasama Kementerian Pengangkutan Malaysia untuk tidak mengambil tindakan ke atas bas-bas ekspres sempena tahun melawat Malaysia yang di lanjutkan sehingga tahun lepas. Mengenai perbandingan dengan negara-negara maju, mereka di iktiraf sebagai negara maju bukan sahaja kerana kemajuan perindustrian dan ekomoni, malah kerana sikap dan mentaliti rakyat mereka juga adalah jauh lebih tinggi dari negara-negara membangun seperti Malaysia. Contohnya, di Jepun dan Eropah, kesedaran mengenai keselamatan sememangnya menjadi perkara utama di dalam kehidupan harian mereka. Pemandu akan memakai tali pinggang keledar keselamatan sebaik sahaja bersedia untuk memandu, anak-anak mereka dididik untuk memakai tali pinggang keledar keselamatan di tempat duduk belakang dan ia telah diimplimentasikan semenjak tahun 70-an tanpa perlu dikuatkuasakan oleh badan penguatkuasa trafik kerana mereka mempunyai kesedaran mengenai tanggungjawab menjaga keselamatan. Berbeza keadaannya di Malaysia di mana pemandu dan penumpang hanya akan memasang tali pinggang keledar keselamatan apabila ternampak anggota JPJ atau Polis. Di Eropah malahan juga Singapura, setiap kenderaan mempunyai alat seperti ‘smart tag’ yang ada di negara kita cuma tol mereka tidak mempunyai palang dan tiada siapa yang melakukan kesalahan melepasi tol tersebut jika tidak mempunyai ‘smart tag’ , senario ini amat berbeza sekali dengan negara ini. Ia adalah disebabkan rakyat di negara mereka sentiasa mematuhi setiap undang-undang dan peraturan yang telah ditetapkan. Untuk menuju ke arah itu rakyat Malaysia perlulah menanamkan sikap dan mentaliti yang sebegitu juga.
Untuk makluman tuan, Jabatan ini menguatkuasakan undang-undang dan peraturan di bawah Akta Pengangkutan Jalan 1987 dan Akta Pelesenan Kenderaan Perdagangan 1987 serta Kaedah-kaedah di bawahnya, yang mana ianya telah digubal setelah dibahaskan di Dewan Rakyat dan Dewan Negara serta telah dipersetujui sebelum diwartakan menjadi undang-undang. JPJ sentiasa mengkaji dan mengemaskini Akta dan Kaedah selari dengan keperluan dan kehendak semasa. Mengenai persoalan ‘nombor spray’ atau ‘nombor tidak timbul’ yang tuan utarakan, kenderaan Singapura menggunakan teknik yang mana nombor di emboss di atas plat dan ianya timbul. JPJ juga sedang mengkaji untuk melaksanakan sistem plat pendaftaran seperti Singapura dalam usaha memperketatkan penguatkuasaan sepertimana yang dilaksanakan oleh Singapura.
Sekian terima kasih.
Bahagian Penguatkuasa,
Ibu PejabatJabatan Pengangkutan Jalan
Putrajaya.
P/s : Langsung tak relevan dengan soalan . Soalannya mengapa di Port (pelabuhan) ada JPJ booth tetapi tidak menahan/menyekat kemasukan kereta re-cond yang sememangnya memakai cermin gelap tanpa tinted film . Setelah pengguna beli baru nak sibuk-sibuk nak enforce law...Apa nie?
Selasa, 5 Januari 2010
Menyokong kekufuran = Kufur
Hari nie aku baca di m-star : "Kalau kita sokong perkara yang kufur, kita pun secara tak langsung akan kufur sama," Kata Dr. Harun Din mengulas isu penggunaan nama Allah setelah Mahkamah Tinggi membenarkan pengunaan kalimah 'Allah' dalam akhbar mingguan Herald-The Catholic Weekly..
Secara kesimpulanya Timbalan Mursidul Am PAS ini meminta pemimpin politik yang menyatakan persetujuan pengunaan nama Allah di kalangan pihak kristian mengkaji semula sokongan tersebut, dan menyeru umat islam bersatu pandangan dalam isu nama Allah ini.
Tapi masih ada pemimpin2 di luar sana , khususnya dari pakatan yang menyokong . Y ? Kerana politik ? Kerana Glamour ? Kerana kurang ilmu ? atau sudah gila ? Tetapi yang lebih gila , masih ramai yg menyokong . itu yg aku naik gila memikirkannya .
Isnin, 4 Januari 2010
Sedar , Bangkit dan tentang keputusan benarkan gereja guna nama Allah!!!!
Petikan ini saya petik dari blog Tun ....interesting too :-
Tahun 2010 dimulakan dengan cara yang menyedihkan di Malaysia, apabila Mahkamah Tinggi semalam, memutuskan agar majalah Gereja Katolik, Herald dibenarkan untuk menggunakan nama Allah.
Biarpun Islam merupakan agama rasmi negara seperti yang diperuntukkan oleh Perlembagaan Persekutuan, namun kedudukan istimewa ini nampaknya tidak membantu untuk memelihara aqidah umat Islam dari dipesongkan dan umat Islam Malaysia dari dikelirukan oleh golongan bukan Islam.
Allah SWT telah memberikan amaran tentang perkara ini di dalam surah al-Baqarah ayat 120 yang bermaksud "orang-orang Yahudi dan Nasrani tidak akan senang terhadap kamu sehingga kamu mengikuti agama mereka.
Katakanlah, sesungguhnya Allah itulah petunjuk (yang benar). Dan sesungguh jika kamu mengikuti kemahuan mereka setelah pengetahuan datang kepadamu, maka Allah tidak akan menjadi pelindung dan penolong bagimu."
Rasulullah saw juga ada memberikan amaran kepada umat Islam tentang perkara ini. Sebuah hadis yang disampaikan oleh Abu Sai'd Al-Khudri r.a dan disepakati oleh semua perawi hadis menyebut, Rasulullah SAW bersabda, "Sungguh-sungguh kamu akan mengikuti tradisi orang-orang sebelum kalian, sejengkal demi sejengkal, sehasta demi sehasta hingga sekiranya mereka masuk ke dalam lubang dhob, nescaya kamu akan meniru dan mencontohi mereka. Kami pun bertanya, "apakah (yang kamu maksudkan adalah) Yahudi dan Nasrani? Beliau menjawab siapa lagi?"
Malangnya walaupun amaran ini telah diberi dan firman Allah swt dengan jelas menyebut `setelah pengetahuan datang kepada kamu', kita masih tidak menyedarinya dan ada pula yang sengaja menipu diri kita demi kepentingan dunia yang tidak kekal.
Faisal Tehrani dalam tulisannya bertajuk `Allah', mempertikaikan bahawa `Allah' digunakan di dalam kitab `Bible'. Malah hujah beliau, ia digunakan sebagai salah satu program indigenisasi Kristian bagi menarik golongan pribumi.
Abu Zulfikar di dalam tulisannya `Isu Penggunaan nama Allah oleh bukan Islam' pula menjelaskan bahawa penentangan penggunaan nama Allah apabila ia dinisbahkan kepada Roh Kudus, Jesus dan sebagainya. Beliau juga dengan meyakinkan menolak hujah yang membolehkan penggunaan nama Allah oleh gereja ini melalui tulisannya 'Menjawab Dr Asri - Isu Allah' dan berdebat dengan golongan Kristian dengan hujah yang menyakinkan di sini.
Hari ini kita mempunyai dua pilihan. Pertama, kita boleh duduk sahaja, mengeluh dan membiarkan sahaja keputusan ini yang akan membuka ruang dan menjadi contoh serta rujukan kepada pelbagai tuntutan oleh Gereja Katolik dan pihak-pihak lain di masa hadapan.
Kedua, kita boleh bangkit dan menentang keputusan ini atas dasar tanggung jawab generasi hari ini untuk berusaha melindungi aqidah generasi akan datang dan agar mereka tidak dikelirukan, lebih-lebih lagi dalam sebuah negara Islam bernama Malaysia.
Ini bukan soal ketidak terbukaan, tetapi soal pemeliharaan aqidah umat Islam dan kemungkinan kewujudan agenda tersembunyi oleh pihak gereja Katolik. Ini juga soal sensitiviti atau kepekaan. Jika hari ini sebagai umat Islam, kita boleh membiarkan perkara yang boleh menggugat aqidah dilaksanakan atas dasar freedom of speech and expression, mungkin pada masa hadapan kita mungkin membenarkan anak-anak kita berbogel kerana kita sendiri suka melihat gambar bogel dan bagi yang berbogel, atas alasan bahawa mereka amat menghargai kecantikan tubuh badan mereka dan tiada salahnya untuk orang lain menghargainya bersama-sama.
Bagi yang menganggap diri mereka liberal, mungkin mereka boleh membaca artikel `Kerajaan Allah, Gereja dan pelayanan' dan `Israel, gereja dan kitab wahyu' sebagai antara ribuan contoh item yang boleh mengelirukan umat Islam dan aqidah generasi masa hadapan.
Hakim Datuk Lau Bee Lan dalam penghakimannya menyebut bahawa Kementerian gagal untuk mengadakan bukti bahawa penggunaan ayat itu boleh mengancam keselamatan negara dan boleh mendatangkan salah faham dan kekeliruan di kalangan umat Islam.
Kita kesal kerana pihak yang diberi tanggung jawab untuk mempertahankan keputusan Menteri Dalam Negeri gagal melaksanakan tanggung jawab mereka dengan baik. Kita mahu mereka memfailkan rayuan dengan SEGERA dan memastikan mereka dapat meyakinkan Hakim Mahkamah Rayuan selepas ini.
Kepada pihak yang berkaitan, walaupun di dalam mahkamah mungkin pihak defendan gagal membuktikan ancaman terhadap keselamatan negara, tetapi itu tidak bermaksud ia tidak wujud dan kemungkinan itu tidak akan berlaku.
Bagi menunjukkan solidariti, keprihatinan dan kepekaan kita terhadap isu-isu yang akan menjejaskan agama Islam dan penganutnya, saya ingin menyeru agar kita bersama-sama hadir ke Masjid Wilayah hari ini untuk solat Jumaat dan menunjukkan bantahan kita terhadap keputusan ini.
Jika di Switzerland, masjid dilarang membangunkan menara masjid/minarets dan Perancis boleh mengharamkan pemakaian tudung di dalam era hak asasi dunia masa kini kononnya, kita tidak faham mengapa di Malaysia, di mana Islam merupakan agama rasminya, penggunaan nama Allah oleh gereja boleh dibenarkan pula?!!!
ISU PENGGUNAAN “ALLAH” OLEH BUKAN ISLAM
Article yang saya baca dari website/bloggers :- very interesting.
Perkara paling penting yang mesti difahami oleh mereka yang mengambil tahu dan berbicara tentang isu ini ialah “APA YANG DITOLAK oleh golongan yang tidak bersetuju perkataan “Allah” digunakan bukan Islam.” Kita jangan suka mengikut-ngikut ataupun bertaqlid tanpa sedikit usaha untuk membuat penelitian.
Kami tidak menentang sama-sekali jika bukan Islam mengatakan, “Tuhan semua orang ialah Allah.” Yang itu kami sangat-sangat setuju, tidak pernah tidak bersetuju.
Yang kami tentang ialah apabila perkataan “Allah” itu dinisbahkan kepada selain Allah. Contohnya “Allah” dinisbahkan kepada Roh Kudus, Jesus, Krishna, Maria, Vishnu, Siva, Subramaniam, God dan sebagainya.
Jika mereka dibenarkan menggunakan perkataan “Allah” lalu mereka nisbahkannya kepada tuhan-tuhan mereka, anda setuju?
SOALAN:
Mengapa sibuk-sibuk dengan isu perkataan “Allah” ini?
JAWAPAN:
Orang yang berpengetahuan tentangnya wajib menyibukkan diri kerana ia adalah persoalan akidah, bukan sekadar persoalan fiqh harian, politik, tajwid dan lain-lain. Sebagaimana yang kita sedia maklum, persoalan akidah ialah persoalan tertinggi dalam agama Islam.
SOALAN:
Bagaimana ia boleh dikatakan persoalan akidah?
JAWAPAN:
Bayangkan orang-orang Kristian yang biasa memakai baju bertulis “Jesus is Crazy” menukarkannya kepada “Allah is Crazy”. Bayangkan juga jika penganut agama Hindu menuliskan “Alif lam lam ha” di dahi patung-patung Tuhan mereka di kuil. Bagaimana pula jika orang-orang Yahudi membuat sebuah filem yang memaparkan Allah (dilakonkan oleh Arnorld tanpa berpakaian- contoh) teruk dibelasah oleh Yaakob (dilakonkan oleh Jim Carrey-contoh) dalam pergaduhan? Mengapa tidak, dalam Old Testament diceritakan Tuhan mereka (Allah) pernah bertumbuk dengan manusia bernama Yaakob dan Tuhan(Allah) kalah.
Anda bersetuju mereka menggunakan perkataan “Allah” untuk tuhan-tuhan mereka?
Rata-rata yang mahu menggunakan “Allah” untuk Tuhan mereka di negara kita ini ialah kaum Kristian Trinity (sila pelajari serba-edikit perbezaan anatara Kristian Unitary dengan Kristian Trinity untuk mendapatkan pemahaman sebenar penentangan kami). Bagi kaum ini, Jesus ialah Allah, Roh Kudus ialah Allah dan Tuhan Bapa juga ialah Allah. Ketiga-tiganya Allah dalam satu kesatuan. Jesus 100% Allah, Roh Kudus 100% Allah dan Tuhan Bapa 100% Allah. Semuanya setara dalam segala hal, tidak berkurang walaupun sedikit.
Sau hari mereka berkata kepada anak-anak muda Muslim, “Allah ialah Jesus, Jesus ialah Allah.” Jika anak-anak muda kita menyangkalnya, mereka akan katakan, “Lihat bukti-bukti ini. Pemerintah kita mengizinkan kami menggunakan Allah untuk Tuhan kami. Ulama-ulama kamu juga benarkannya. Jadi kami gunakan Allah untuk Tuhan kami iaitu Jesus, Roh Kudus, Maria dan lain-lain. Bagaimana kamu boleh menidakkannya pula?”
Di sini ada kemungkinan anak-anak muda kita akan terperangkap. Mereka akan meyakini bahawa Allah ialah Roh Kudus dan Roh Kudus ialah Allah.
Boleh nampak apa yang cuba saya sampaikan?
Bukankah ia persoalan akidah?
Bolehkah kita senang-senang mengatakan, “Biarlah, saya tak mahu panjang-panjangkan isu ini” tanpa mahu menarik balik kebenaran yang kita beri?
Bukankah kebenaran yang diberikan itu akan jadikan hujah oleh mereka yang bukan Islam sampai bila-bila hingga ke zaman anak cucu kita?
SOALAN:
Bukankah dalam al-Quran sendiri dibenarkan orang-orang bukan Islam menggunakan perkataan “Allah”?
JAWAPAN:
Setahu saya tidak pernah ada. Jika ada sesiapa terjumpa sila maklumkan, saya akan betulkan kenyataan saya. Yang menyebut perkataan “Allah” untuk dinisbahkan kepada Tuhan sebenar (ataupun Tuhan tertinggi menurut mereka) dalam al-Quran itu ialah kaum musyrikin Quraisy dan sekitarnya. Tidak ada bukti (saya belum menemui) dalam al-Quran menunjukkan penganut agama Zoroaster menyebut Tuhan mereka “Allah”, begitu juga dengan penganut ajaran Kung Fu Tze, Mesir purba, Buddha, Hindu, Shinto, Tao dan lain-lain. Jika benar ada tolong tunjukkan. Apatah lagi hendak dibenarkan penganut agama Kristian Trinitarian di Malaysia hari ini menggunakannya.
SOALAN:
Bukankah ayat-ayat Quran di bawah ini membenarkan orang bukan Islam (termasuklah Kristian Unitary) menggunakan “Allah”?
JAWAPAN:
Al-Ankabuut: [29.61] Dan sesungguhnya jika engkau (wahai MUHAMMAD) bertanya kepada MEREKA (YANG MUSYRIK) itu: "Siapakah yang menciptakan langit dan bumi, dan yang memudahkan matahari dan bulan (untuk faedah makhluk-makhlukNya)?" Sudah tentu mereka akan menjawab: "Allah". Maka bagaimana mereka tergamak dipalingkan (oleh hawa nafsunya daripada mengakui keesaan Allah dan mematuhi perintahNya)? [29.63] Dan sesungguhnya jika engkau (wahai Muhammad) bertanya kepada mereka (yang musyrik) itu: "Siapakah yang menurunkan hujan dari langit, lalu Ia hidupkan dengannya tumbuh-tumbuhan di bumi sesudah matinya?" Sudah tentu mereka akan menjawab: "Allah". Ucapkanlah (wahai Muhammad): "Alhamdulillah" (sebagai bersyukur disebabkan pengakuan mereka yang demikian), bahkan kebanyakan mereka tidak memahami (hakikat tauhid dan pengertian syirik).
Surah Luqman:
[31.25] Dan sesungguhnya jika engkau (wahai Muhammad) bertanya kepada mereka (yang musyrik) itu: "Siapakah yang menciptakan langit dan bumi?" Sudah tentu mereka akan menjawab: "Allah". Ucapkanlah (wahai Muhammad): "Alhamdulillah" (sebagai bersyukur disebabkan pengakuan mereka yang demikian - tidak mengingkari Allah), bahkan kebanyakan mereka tidak mengetahui (hakikat tauhid dan pengertian syirik).
JAWAPAN:
“MEREKA” dalam ayat-ayat ini ialah kaum musyrikin Arab di sekeliling Rasulullah, bukan selainnya. Bila masanya Nabi Muhammad berdialog dengan kaum Kristian Unitary, Majusi, Shinto dan lain-lain?
Memang tidak salah jika kaum musyrik Arab menggunakan “Allah” kerana memang mereka nisbahkan kepada Allah sebenar. Mereka tahu Allahlah Tuhan sebenar tetapi mereka turut menyembah selain-Nya iaitu berhala-berhala. Bagi mereka, Allahlah sebenarnya yang berkuasa tetapi berhala-berhala juga turut mempunyai kuasa. Maksudnya mereka menyekutukan Allah, mensyirikkan Allah. Sebab itu dinamakan MUSYRIK/ MUSYRIKIN. Nabi Muhammad berdialog dengan mereka, bukan dengan orang-orang bukan Islam lain.
Jauh sekali dengan penganut agama Kristian Unitary yang menganggap Jesus, Maria dan Roh Kudus sebagai Allah. Kita jangan terkeliru dalam memahami ayat-ayat ini.
Perkara paling penting yang mesti difahami oleh mereka yang mengambil tahu dan berbicara tentang isu ini ialah “APA YANG DITOLAK oleh golongan yang tidak bersetuju perkataan “Allah” digunakan bukan Islam.” Kita jangan suka mengikut-ngikut ataupun bertaqlid tanpa sedikit usaha untuk membuat penelitian.
Kami tidak menentang sama-sekali jika bukan Islam mengatakan, “Tuhan semua orang ialah Allah.” Yang itu kami sangat-sangat setuju, tidak pernah tidak bersetuju.
Yang kami tentang ialah apabila perkataan “Allah” itu dinisbahkan kepada selain Allah. Contohnya “Allah” dinisbahkan kepada Roh Kudus, Jesus, Krishna, Maria, Vishnu, Siva, Subramaniam, God dan sebagainya.
Jika mereka dibenarkan menggunakan perkataan “Allah” lalu mereka nisbahkannya kepada tuhan-tuhan mereka, anda setuju?
SOALAN:
Mengapa sibuk-sibuk dengan isu perkataan “Allah” ini?
JAWAPAN:
Orang yang berpengetahuan tentangnya wajib menyibukkan diri kerana ia adalah persoalan akidah, bukan sekadar persoalan fiqh harian, politik, tajwid dan lain-lain. Sebagaimana yang kita sedia maklum, persoalan akidah ialah persoalan tertinggi dalam agama Islam.
SOALAN:
Bagaimana ia boleh dikatakan persoalan akidah?
JAWAPAN:
Bayangkan orang-orang Kristian yang biasa memakai baju bertulis “Jesus is Crazy” menukarkannya kepada “Allah is Crazy”. Bayangkan juga jika penganut agama Hindu menuliskan “Alif lam lam ha” di dahi patung-patung Tuhan mereka di kuil. Bagaimana pula jika orang-orang Yahudi membuat sebuah filem yang memaparkan Allah (dilakonkan oleh Arnorld tanpa berpakaian- contoh) teruk dibelasah oleh Yaakob (dilakonkan oleh Jim Carrey-contoh) dalam pergaduhan? Mengapa tidak, dalam Old Testament diceritakan Tuhan mereka (Allah) pernah bertumbuk dengan manusia bernama Yaakob dan Tuhan(Allah) kalah.
Anda bersetuju mereka menggunakan perkataan “Allah” untuk tuhan-tuhan mereka?
Rata-rata yang mahu menggunakan “Allah” untuk Tuhan mereka di negara kita ini ialah kaum Kristian Trinity (sila pelajari serba-edikit perbezaan anatara Kristian Unitary dengan Kristian Trinity untuk mendapatkan pemahaman sebenar penentangan kami). Bagi kaum ini, Jesus ialah Allah, Roh Kudus ialah Allah dan Tuhan Bapa juga ialah Allah. Ketiga-tiganya Allah dalam satu kesatuan. Jesus 100% Allah, Roh Kudus 100% Allah dan Tuhan Bapa 100% Allah. Semuanya setara dalam segala hal, tidak berkurang walaupun sedikit.
Sau hari mereka berkata kepada anak-anak muda Muslim, “Allah ialah Jesus, Jesus ialah Allah.” Jika anak-anak muda kita menyangkalnya, mereka akan katakan, “Lihat bukti-bukti ini. Pemerintah kita mengizinkan kami menggunakan Allah untuk Tuhan kami. Ulama-ulama kamu juga benarkannya. Jadi kami gunakan Allah untuk Tuhan kami iaitu Jesus, Roh Kudus, Maria dan lain-lain. Bagaimana kamu boleh menidakkannya pula?”
Di sini ada kemungkinan anak-anak muda kita akan terperangkap. Mereka akan meyakini bahawa Allah ialah Roh Kudus dan Roh Kudus ialah Allah.
Boleh nampak apa yang cuba saya sampaikan?
Bukankah ia persoalan akidah?
Bolehkah kita senang-senang mengatakan, “Biarlah, saya tak mahu panjang-panjangkan isu ini” tanpa mahu menarik balik kebenaran yang kita beri?
Bukankah kebenaran yang diberikan itu akan jadikan hujah oleh mereka yang bukan Islam sampai bila-bila hingga ke zaman anak cucu kita?
SOALAN:
Bukankah dalam al-Quran sendiri dibenarkan orang-orang bukan Islam menggunakan perkataan “Allah”?
JAWAPAN:
Setahu saya tidak pernah ada. Jika ada sesiapa terjumpa sila maklumkan, saya akan betulkan kenyataan saya. Yang menyebut perkataan “Allah” untuk dinisbahkan kepada Tuhan sebenar (ataupun Tuhan tertinggi menurut mereka) dalam al-Quran itu ialah kaum musyrikin Quraisy dan sekitarnya. Tidak ada bukti (saya belum menemui) dalam al-Quran menunjukkan penganut agama Zoroaster menyebut Tuhan mereka “Allah”, begitu juga dengan penganut ajaran Kung Fu Tze, Mesir purba, Buddha, Hindu, Shinto, Tao dan lain-lain. Jika benar ada tolong tunjukkan. Apatah lagi hendak dibenarkan penganut agama Kristian Trinitarian di Malaysia hari ini menggunakannya.
SOALAN:
Bukankah ayat-ayat Quran di bawah ini membenarkan orang bukan Islam (termasuklah Kristian Unitary) menggunakan “Allah”?
JAWAPAN:
Al-Ankabuut: [29.61] Dan sesungguhnya jika engkau (wahai MUHAMMAD) bertanya kepada MEREKA (YANG MUSYRIK) itu: "Siapakah yang menciptakan langit dan bumi, dan yang memudahkan matahari dan bulan (untuk faedah makhluk-makhlukNya)?" Sudah tentu mereka akan menjawab: "Allah". Maka bagaimana mereka tergamak dipalingkan (oleh hawa nafsunya daripada mengakui keesaan Allah dan mematuhi perintahNya)? [29.63] Dan sesungguhnya jika engkau (wahai Muhammad) bertanya kepada mereka (yang musyrik) itu: "Siapakah yang menurunkan hujan dari langit, lalu Ia hidupkan dengannya tumbuh-tumbuhan di bumi sesudah matinya?" Sudah tentu mereka akan menjawab: "Allah". Ucapkanlah (wahai Muhammad): "Alhamdulillah" (sebagai bersyukur disebabkan pengakuan mereka yang demikian), bahkan kebanyakan mereka tidak memahami (hakikat tauhid dan pengertian syirik).
Surah Luqman:
[31.25] Dan sesungguhnya jika engkau (wahai Muhammad) bertanya kepada mereka (yang musyrik) itu: "Siapakah yang menciptakan langit dan bumi?" Sudah tentu mereka akan menjawab: "Allah". Ucapkanlah (wahai Muhammad): "Alhamdulillah" (sebagai bersyukur disebabkan pengakuan mereka yang demikian - tidak mengingkari Allah), bahkan kebanyakan mereka tidak mengetahui (hakikat tauhid dan pengertian syirik).
JAWAPAN:
“MEREKA” dalam ayat-ayat ini ialah kaum musyrikin Arab di sekeliling Rasulullah, bukan selainnya. Bila masanya Nabi Muhammad berdialog dengan kaum Kristian Unitary, Majusi, Shinto dan lain-lain?
Memang tidak salah jika kaum musyrik Arab menggunakan “Allah” kerana memang mereka nisbahkan kepada Allah sebenar. Mereka tahu Allahlah Tuhan sebenar tetapi mereka turut menyembah selain-Nya iaitu berhala-berhala. Bagi mereka, Allahlah sebenarnya yang berkuasa tetapi berhala-berhala juga turut mempunyai kuasa. Maksudnya mereka menyekutukan Allah, mensyirikkan Allah. Sebab itu dinamakan MUSYRIK/ MUSYRIKIN. Nabi Muhammad berdialog dengan mereka, bukan dengan orang-orang bukan Islam lain.
Jauh sekali dengan penganut agama Kristian Unitary yang menganggap Jesus, Maria dan Roh Kudus sebagai Allah. Kita jangan terkeliru dalam memahami ayat-ayat ini.
Asas Christianity
Dikenali juga sebagai agama Nasrani. Dibawa oleh Jesus Christ (Nabi Isa) lebih kurang 2000 tahun yang lampau. Kitab suci Kristian adalah Bible yang terdiri daripada Old Testament (Perjanjian Lama) dan New Testament (Perjanjian Baru). Old Testament (Perjanjian Lama) ini juga berisi kitab Taurat dan Zabur, yang asalnya diturunkan Tuhan kepada Nabi Musa dan Nabi Daud. Kitab ini menjadi kitab suci bagi orang-orang Yahudi (Jew/ Jewish). Namun begitu orang-orang Yahudi menolak sama sekali New Testament (Perjanjian Baru). New Testament (Perjanjian Baru) turut mengandungi kitab Injil, yang asalnya diturunkan Tuhan kepada Nabi Isa (Jesus). Yahudi menolak New Testament kerana mereka tidak mengiktiraf Nabi Isa sebagai seorang nabi, sebagaimana orang-orang Kristian yang menolak kitab Al Quran kerana mereka tidak mengiktiraf Nabi Muhammad SAW.
Namun begitu Kristian menerima Old Testament dan menggabungkannya bersama New Testament yang dikenali sebagai Bible pada hari ini. Orang-orang Kristian percaya yang Bible diturunkan secara ilham, bukannya secara bunyi huruf demi huruf sebagaimana ayat-ayat suci Al Quran. Sebab itulah Bible zaman dahulu tidak sama penulisannya dengan Bible yang ada hari ini malah berbeza-beza pula mengikut suasana dan tempat. Ini berbeza sekali dengan Al Quran yang masih sama penulisan dan isi kandungannya sejak 1400 tahun yang lalu. Di antara ajaran terpenting (paling asas) dalam Kristian yang mesti di terima secara mutlak- tidak boleh dipersoalkan lagi adalah konsep Triniti.
Konsep Triniti ini bermaksud tiga Tuhan dalam satu iaitu Tuhan Bapa (God/ Father), Roh Kudus (Holy Spirit) dan Jesus Christ (Nabi Isa) bersatu dalam satu gabungan sebagai Tuhan. Ada juga yang memasukkan Maria (Mariam) ibu Jesus ke dalam Triniti. Jesus merupakan Anak Tuhan. Dia mempunyai dua keadaan iaitu badan kemanusiaan Jesus dan badan ketuhanan Jesus. Dia diutus ke dunia ini oleh Bapanya (Tuhan) untuk menebus segala dosa manusia. Untuk itu dia mesti dibunuh dan telah pun dibunuh dengan cara disalib. Maka dosa-dosa manusia pun tertebus. ‘Dosa waris’ juga menjadi ajaran asas, iaitu semua manusia mewarisi dosa daripada Nabi Adam dan Hawa (Eve) yang pernah melanggar perintah Tuhan. Dosa waris ini terhapus dengan penyaliban Jesus.
Ajaran-ajaran asas atau persoalan-persoalan pokok dalam agama Kristian ini semuanya mesti diterima secara mutlak, iaitu tidak boleh dipersoalkan lagi sama ada benar atau tidak. Barang siapa yang mempersoalkan salah satu daripada persoalan-persoalan pokok ini (atau tidak percaya salah satu daripadanya) maka menurut kebanyakan pendeta, dia bukanlah seorang Kristian lagi. Dalam erti kata lain, semua inilah prinsip-prinsip asas aqidah agama Kristian. Sekiranya rosak salah satu sahaja daripada prinsip-prinsip kepercayaan ini maka rosaklah seluruh agama Kristian tersebut walau sebaik manapun umatnya. Sebaliknya, jika betullah semua prinsip-prinsip asas ini maka betullah seluruh agama Kristian itu walau serosak manapun umatnya. Ini kerana yang rosak adalah umat, bukan agama itu sendiri.
Umat Kristian terbahagi kepada beberapa mazhab dan aliran. Dua mazhab terbesar adalah Roman Khatolik dan Protestan yang saling bermusuhan hingga mengakibatkan pertumpahan darah sehinggalah ke hari ini. Ketua seluruh umat Kristian Roman Katholik bergelar Pope yang tinggal di bandaraya suci Kristian iaitu di Vatican City, negara terkecil di dunia yang terletak di Eropah. Umat Kristian dan Yahudi menolak Nabi Muhammad kerana bagi mereka para nabi (utusan Tuhan) itu mestilah lahir dalam kalangan Bani Israil sahaja. Nabi Muhammad lahir daripada keturunan Arab (bukan Bani Israil), maka langsung tidak layak menjadi utusan Tuhan melainkan seorang pembohong.
Namun begitu Kristian menerima Old Testament dan menggabungkannya bersama New Testament yang dikenali sebagai Bible pada hari ini. Orang-orang Kristian percaya yang Bible diturunkan secara ilham, bukannya secara bunyi huruf demi huruf sebagaimana ayat-ayat suci Al Quran. Sebab itulah Bible zaman dahulu tidak sama penulisannya dengan Bible yang ada hari ini malah berbeza-beza pula mengikut suasana dan tempat. Ini berbeza sekali dengan Al Quran yang masih sama penulisan dan isi kandungannya sejak 1400 tahun yang lalu. Di antara ajaran terpenting (paling asas) dalam Kristian yang mesti di terima secara mutlak- tidak boleh dipersoalkan lagi adalah konsep Triniti.
Konsep Triniti ini bermaksud tiga Tuhan dalam satu iaitu Tuhan Bapa (God/ Father), Roh Kudus (Holy Spirit) dan Jesus Christ (Nabi Isa) bersatu dalam satu gabungan sebagai Tuhan. Ada juga yang memasukkan Maria (Mariam) ibu Jesus ke dalam Triniti. Jesus merupakan Anak Tuhan. Dia mempunyai dua keadaan iaitu badan kemanusiaan Jesus dan badan ketuhanan Jesus. Dia diutus ke dunia ini oleh Bapanya (Tuhan) untuk menebus segala dosa manusia. Untuk itu dia mesti dibunuh dan telah pun dibunuh dengan cara disalib. Maka dosa-dosa manusia pun tertebus. ‘Dosa waris’ juga menjadi ajaran asas, iaitu semua manusia mewarisi dosa daripada Nabi Adam dan Hawa (Eve) yang pernah melanggar perintah Tuhan. Dosa waris ini terhapus dengan penyaliban Jesus.
Ajaran-ajaran asas atau persoalan-persoalan pokok dalam agama Kristian ini semuanya mesti diterima secara mutlak, iaitu tidak boleh dipersoalkan lagi sama ada benar atau tidak. Barang siapa yang mempersoalkan salah satu daripada persoalan-persoalan pokok ini (atau tidak percaya salah satu daripadanya) maka menurut kebanyakan pendeta, dia bukanlah seorang Kristian lagi. Dalam erti kata lain, semua inilah prinsip-prinsip asas aqidah agama Kristian. Sekiranya rosak salah satu sahaja daripada prinsip-prinsip kepercayaan ini maka rosaklah seluruh agama Kristian tersebut walau sebaik manapun umatnya. Sebaliknya, jika betullah semua prinsip-prinsip asas ini maka betullah seluruh agama Kristian itu walau serosak manapun umatnya. Ini kerana yang rosak adalah umat, bukan agama itu sendiri.
Umat Kristian terbahagi kepada beberapa mazhab dan aliran. Dua mazhab terbesar adalah Roman Khatolik dan Protestan yang saling bermusuhan hingga mengakibatkan pertumpahan darah sehinggalah ke hari ini. Ketua seluruh umat Kristian Roman Katholik bergelar Pope yang tinggal di bandaraya suci Kristian iaitu di Vatican City, negara terkecil di dunia yang terletak di Eropah. Umat Kristian dan Yahudi menolak Nabi Muhammad kerana bagi mereka para nabi (utusan Tuhan) itu mestilah lahir dalam kalangan Bani Israil sahaja. Nabi Muhammad lahir daripada keturunan Arab (bukan Bani Israil), maka langsung tidak layak menjadi utusan Tuhan melainkan seorang pembohong.
Langgan:
Catatan (Atom)
.jpg)
.jpg)